0 Members and 12 Guests are viewing this topic.
Oh branding, I was going to suggest that. The only thing is branding initials seems like something the dominant would be more apt to do to the submissive versus the the other way around. Branding your initials is marking your property. I wouldn't think the dominant class would be up for anything resembling that. Perhaps instead of getting their submissive partners initials the dominant self brands themselves with either a special symbol from society or perhaps their family crest. This mark would announce their final step into manhood along with the fact they have claimed someone. Then it would be more like a self empowered mark versus a sign you belong to someone else.
Mmm, but the point of this is that people don't fit stereotypes. Not all Dominants actually have 'dominant' personalities and not all Submissives have 'submissive' personalities, so there's no one rule fits all for either of them because of the fact that they're all different, unique people.
Yah, I figured not all of them would have a family crest but it might be something those from higher up would want to flash to announce their pedigree.Those without some sort of crest would perhaps use a seal involving their initials or something along those lines.@SammuelColdheart- A brand isn't going to stop other's with foul intentions. It just lets them know who they will be dealing with if they decide to try and play with something that isn't theirs.
I was talking for the most classical scenario... if you get what I mean. I highgly doubt that the dominants which we have will be submissive as far as I saw they are either switch leaning more towards dominating someone, or a semes. xD
Quote from: SammuelColdheart on June 15, 2014, 21:30:49 pmI was talking for the most classical scenario... if you get what I mean. I highgly doubt that the dominants which we have will be submissive as far as I saw they are either switch leaning more towards dominating someone, or a semes. xDYou do know that a dominant personality or one's looks doesn't necessarily have anything to do with what one prefers to do as far as positions in bed right? Someone can be submissive and like to top they can be dominant and still like to play from the bottom. Judging a book from its cover is like stating all girls must be submissive because they don't have a noodle dangling out front when they pee.